Patrick Zahraj vs Giulio Zeppieri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Patrick Zahraj currently has a second serve win percentage of 42.20%, compared to Giulio Zeppieri's 47.57%. Does this give Zeppieri a slight edge with the second serve performance? Yes, it does.
• When it comes to returning second serves, Zahraj excels with a 46.71% win rate, while Zeppieri trails with 40.88%. Could this indicate an advantage for Zahraj while returning serve? Absolutely.
• In first serve return points, Zahraj leads slightly with 25.99% compared to Zeppieri's 23.38%. Zahraj seems to have a slight upper hand here as well.
• Under pressure, Zahraj saves 59.38% of breakpoints, outpacing Zeppieri who saves 55.23%. Is Zahraj better at handling breakpoints? Statistically, yes.
• Overall, Zeppieri has a higher match win percentage over the past year at 62.71%, while Zahraj stands at 56.10%. Which player appears to have been more successful recently? Zeppieri indeed.
• Different surfaces favor different players; Zahraj performs best on indoor hard courts with a 65% win rate, while Zeppieri excels on hard courts with the same win percentage.
• Playing exposition varies: Zahraj and Zeppieri both compete largely at Challengers/ITF > $10K, with Zahraj winning 57.63% compared to Zeppieri's 63.64%.
• The quality of opponents also differs; Zahraj's opponents have an average rank of 341.44, whereas Zeppieri faces tougher competitors averaging a rank of 230.66. Does Zeppieri have more experience against higher-ranked competition? Yes, he does.
• In matches that go to a deciding set, both players are evenly matched over the past year, each winning 58% of such sets.

Editorial Prediction (October 11, 2025, UTC):

Giulio Zeppieri appears to have the upper hand in the upcoming match against Patrick Zahraj based on several pivotal factors. With a superior second serve performance and a higher match win percentage over the last year, Zeppieri shows promising consistency in his gameplay.

Despite Zahraj’s slight advantage in returning serve and handling pressure, Zeppieri’s ability to consistently challenge higher-ranked opponents should not be underestimated. The fact that Zeppieri plays effectively on hard courts, which is one of the surfaces in this tournament, further strengthens his potential in this matchup.

In summary, leveraging his resilience against tougher competition and his strong overall match performance, Giulio Zeppieri is predicted to be the favored contender in this contest.